top of page

the USA

United States, a Corporation?. The slave people? I found a pretty good article about what the United States represents according to the laws there (more specifically its political constitution) and I was shocked. It seems that the US is a company (legal entity) and citizens are not even "defined" anywhere. It seems that the US depends more than one thinks on England. taken from trinity to earth I translate a text written by a certain Stephen Ames, which is probably a pseudonym, called "The Last Illusion". It is taken from a website called "Forbidden Knowledge", written in English and dealing with the issues we see here. I have selected it because it contains detailed information about references that we can consult. For me that is something that allows us to defend, discuss or reject its content because we can analyze the sources. The text is interesting for several reasons. 1. One because it reaches the same conclusion that many of us have already reached two. Two, because it explains legal nuances that usually escape most of us if we have not received proper legal or legal instruction. The legal language is different and it is specific and this has been kept that way to facilitate the control of those who do not understand it, but are equally bound by contracts, treaties, constitutions, laws to the letter printed in them. And, unfortunately for us, we are linked to that letter that we do not understand for life. I advance the last sentence of the author in this article: “Do not let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be free. You must understand that slavery and freedom originate in the mind." Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended the United States Social Security system as follows: YES. 1997 NO.1778 Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made on July 22, 1997, which enters into force on September 1, 1997. Read here and here. In the Court of Buckingham Palace on July 22, 1997 Now, therefore, Your Majesty in pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administrative Act of 1992 and all other powers in your favour, have the pleasure, for and with the council of his privy council, order, and therefore order the following: "This Order may be cited as the Social Security Order 1997 and shall take effect on September 1, 1997." Does it make any sense that the Federal Court of Justice of Willian Wayne receives orders from England? This Order is intended to redefine some words in the Social Security Act and make some changes to United States Law. Remember, King George was the, Arch Treasurer and Prince Elect of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America. You can see the Treaty of Peace (1783) 8, from the United States. Statutes, where it says Great Britain, the Pope's agent, is in charge of the United States. What people don't know is that the so-called “Founding Fathers” and King George worked hand in hand to bring Americans to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and tie them to a debt they couldn't pay. First of all you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it already existed before the Revolutionary War (read Republic v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15) ). The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation. Now, you must also realize that King George was not only the King of England, he was also the King of France. (See Peace treaty * U.S. Statute 8, line 80.). On January 22, 1783, Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 credits that the UNITED STATES had already received dated February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. The UNITED STATES corporation now owns of the King's money until January 1, 1778 from King George via France. King George therefore financed both sides of the American Revolutionary War. Of the Articles of Confederation, which were declared in force on March 1, 1781, article 12 says: “All lines of credit issued, money that had been lent, and debts incurred, by and under the authority of Congress, prior to the constitution of the United States, must be repaid and deemed charges to the United States, for repayment. full and balance for which the United States and the public faith are, therefore, solemnly pledged to these debts”. The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George. Later, after losing the American War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to make the people King's debtors, the conquest was not over fully completed. The loans were already due to be repaid and a meeting was scheduled in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the country's economic instability under the Articles of Confederation. Only five states attended the meeting, and another meeting was to take place in Philadelphia the following year for the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation. On February 21, 1787, Congress gave approval to meet in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, and to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to be done about the outstanding debt. Little did people know that the so-called “founding fathers” were going to reorganize the United States because the country was already bankrupt then. On September 17, 1787, twelve state delegates approved the Constitution. The States thus became Constituents. “Constitutor”, by definition in civil law, is one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of a debt to another (Blacks Law Dictionary 6, Ed). The States were now responsible for the debt to the King, but the people of America were not, since they were not Parties to the Constitution, that is, they were not bound by the Constitution since they had never been made to vote on it. On August 4, 1790, an Act entitled "Act to Provide Payment of the Debt of the United States" was passed. This can be found in the US Statutes on pages 138-178. This Act was intended to abolish the States and created the figure of the Districts. If you don't believe this, you can look it up for yourself. The Act established Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania two were created. In this Act, each District was associated with a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments, which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the states needed to legally bind the debt to the people. The original State Constitutions were never presented to the people for a vote. So governments wrote new constitutions and presented them to the people for a vote, thereby linking the debt owed to Britain to the citizens. People became citizens of the state from the moment they resided in it and, ipso facto, became "citizens of the United States." A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and is synonymous with "subject." What you think is a state is actually a corporation. In other words, a LEGAL PERSON. “Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is a juridical person” 9 F. Supp 272. The word “juridical person” does not include the state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176. So there are no states, but corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction in short. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind that are addressed to you. We work, and we give our property and our children to a fiction. For an in-depth look at the nature of these corporations and to see how you, too, have been declared a fictional entity, check out this book AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE - JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. (American Law and procedure, jurisprudence and legal institutions) VOL. XIII written by James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) of La Salle University. This book explains in detail the nature and purpose of these corporations. You will be stunned when you read it. Before we continue, let's examine a few things from the Articles of the Constitution: Article 6 section 1 says: "All Debts, contracted and all agreements made, before the adoption of this Constitution shall be valid against the United States under this Constitution." Another interesting clue can be found in Article One of section Eight clause Two which says: "Congress has the power to lend money on the credit of the United States." This was needed so that the United States, which went bankrupt on January 1, 1778, could borrow money, and also because the States were Parties to the Constitution and would be bound by it. The next master move was the creation of the Bank of the United States in 1791. This was a private bank of which 25,000 shares were issued, of which 18,000 belonged to England. The bank lent US money in exchange for US securities. Now the creditors of the United States, which included the King, wanted to receive interest on the loans they had made to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of ​​taxing alcohol. The people resisted and George Washington sent in the militia to collect taxes and they succeeded. This came to be called the Whiskey Rebellion. The duty of the militia is to collect taxes. How could the United States collect taxes from the people if the people are not a Party to the Constitution? I'll tell you. We are slaves. The United States belongs to the founding fathers, their heirs, and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a plantation. It has always been like this. How many times have you seen someone in court try to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him that he can't, that he has no right? This happens because neither you nor I are a Party to the Constitution. We are slaves! If you don't believe me, read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. “The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah” 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states: “But, in truth, no private person has the right to claim, going to court, on the grounds that the Constitution has been breached. The Constitution is a true document, it is compact, but the private person is not a Party to this Document.” Back to the matter of the military. Simply read Article One Section Eight clause 15 which says: "The job of the militia is to execute the laws of the Union." Now he reads clause 16 which says: "Congress has the power to provide for the organization, army, and discipline of the militia, and to govern every part thereof to be employed in the service of the United States." The military is not here to protect you or me; your obligation is to collect all our substance. As you can see perfectly throughout the Constitution, a Military Government is established to protect the King's trade and make us his slaves. If you go to Statute 8 on lines 116-132 you will find “Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation”. This treaty was signed on November 18, 1794, twelve years after the war. Article 2 of the treaty says that the King's troops were still occupying the United States in 1794. Apparently, as he was a very "kind" king, it is seen that he decided that the troops should return to England on June 1, 1796 (years after the war ended). The English troops were still on American soil because the king simply wanted them to stay there. Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems but they too are, for the most part, slaves. The Jewish Law, however, is the one that governs the entire world, as can be found in "The Jewish Law" written by Menachem Elom, President of the Supreme Court of Israel, which says: “Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is linked to Israel. Each city and country must follow the customs, give effect to the decrees and carry out the enactments of the Talmudic sages because the entire Jewish nation accepted everything that the Talmud says. The sages who adopted the enactments and decrees, instituted the practices, made the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the sages of Israel. It was they who received the tradition of the foundations of the complete Torah in an unbroken succession from Moses, our teacher.” We are living under what the Bible calls Mamon (Note: God of greed). Mamon is defined as “Civil Law and Procedure”. Now coming back to the book "The Shetar Effect on English Law", the essence of the report is based on the historical explanation of the Georgetown University Magazine on what a mortgage is, and its relationship with the financing of the property. Its author Judith Shapiro says: “The most important thing is that the elevation of real estate, allowed by the Jewish Law of the Shetar, has been adopted by English Law, a law of the Jews becomes Law of the Land“. This can be read in “La Ciudad de Jorge Law Magazine Vol 71: pages 1179-1200.” The article clearly states that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon kings. He also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code which is international private law. The written credit agreement, the Jewish Shetar, is a lien on all the world's property. The treaty also explains that the Jews are the property of Great Britain and that the Jews are in charge of the Banking System. We live under the Babylonian Talmud which was brought to England in the year 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and all religions ever since. Everything is an absolute mind control, people are educated to believe in things that do not exist. Private International Law, which is commercial law, deals only with fictions, known as “Juridical Persons”. A person is a fictional entity for the law, not a human being. See See UCC 1-201.

But, in truth, no private person has the right to claim, presenting the case before a court on the basis that the Constitution is violated. The constitution is true, it is compact, but the private person is not a Part of it.” See UCC 1-201. You have to understand that Great Britain (article 6 section 1), the United States and the States are the Parties to the Constitution, not you or me. Let me explain one thing to you. Imagine this: I buy someone a car, the car is under warranty, and the engine breaks on the first day of using it. I tell the seller that nothing happens and then you come, a third party, and you urge the man to pay me and he refuses and you take him to court for not having respected the contract. The court says that the case is not accepted. Why? Because you are not a Party to the Contract. You cannot judge a member of the government for not adhering to a contract (called a Constitution) to which you are not a Party. You had better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you attempt to use the Constitution, you are in fact committing a crime legally known as "trespassing." Why? Because you are trying to interfere in a private contract to which you are not a Party. Also, to make things even more difficult, you are a debt slave who owns no property and has no rights. You are a simple user of the property of your Owners. Here I put some examples of cases and jurisprudence (real sentences): “The primary control and custody of children rests with the government” Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62. “Marriage is a civil contract in which there are 3 parties, the husband, the wife and the state” Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146. “The ultimate ownership of all property belongs to the State: The “property”. So called individual is only by virtue of the Government, that is, the law refers to him as a mere user, and the use must be in accordance with the law and subordinate to the need of the State.” Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You do not own any property because you are a slave. You really are worse than a slave because you are also a debtor slave. "The right of traffic or transmission of property, as an inalienable absolute right, is one that has never existed since governments were instituted and can never exist under any government." (Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep. 378, 481) Great Britain, to this day, collects taxes from Americans. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. All taxpayers have an Individual Master File in code. Using IRS Publication 6209, which is about 400 pages long, you can see a series that shows the payer the type of taxes he is paying. Most of the taxpayers are under headings 300-399, which according to document 6209 is a series that is reserved, worse if you go to the Business Master File of 300-399 in the 6209 prior to 1991, you will see that it was called " USA-UK tax claims” means that taxpayers are considered a business and a party to commerce and are bound by a US-UK tax treaty payable to the UK. The model that is supposed to be used for this is model 8288, FIRPTA - which stands for Foreign Investment Real Property Collection Account. Form 8288 is found in the IRS Law Enforcement Manual, Chapter 3. The Office of Budget Documentation and Management at the Department of the Treasury, Active Information Collection List, approved under the Paper Management Reduction Act is where form 8200 can be found under OMB number 1545-0902 which reads: ”U.S. with tax return for dispositions by foreign legal entities”. These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Generated CP 55 Banned Valuation valid for MFT 30 which is the code for model 1040. IMF 310-399 says the same thing as IMF 300- 399. BMF 390-399 says US-UK Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it incredible that model 1040 is a tax payment to Great Britain? Everyone is always looking for the USC 26 of the Tax Law, which obliges one to pay the so-called INCOME TAX (income tax) but this legal obligation cannot be found there because this is not considered a tax like the others, but a collection of debt established in a private contract called the Constitution of the United States article 6, section One and in several later agreements. Doesn't this remind you of a cow paying income tax when the machine is permanently connected to the milker?

Well the answer is no. I have never met a cow with property or that she has been rewarded for her work. You do not own anything that your work has ever produced. You don't even own your work or yourself. Your work is measured in current credit, which is debt. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your work so that you have food, clothing, and everything you need to bring in and feed more slaves. We are cows, and simply put: * the IRS is a company that milks the cow * the corporation of the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd * Great Britain (Note: the crown, not its citizens) owns the farm * the farm is land wholly owned by the Papacy Now the picture becomes much clearer after reading the following paragraphs. We will now show that the Pope is directly involved in this scheme of things. Let's read: Being persuaded that religious principles are those which can still most powerfully contribute to keeping nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare that their intention is to uphold in their respective states those measures that the clergy can adopt to maintain the authority of the princes, so that they are, minutely connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers unite in thanking the pope for all that he has already done for them and requesting his constant co-operation in his opinion to subjugate the nations.” (Article 3 of the Varona treaty signed in 1822) Plus: “If the sovereign pontiff insists that his law be obeyed, it must be obeyed” Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844 ”Pontifical laws are also binding, even without having been accepted or confirmed by secular rulers” Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. “…and therefore national law such as Federal Law or exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevailing in the United States may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff” Elements of Ecclesiastical Law, Vol. I 53-54 Does this finally clarify that the Pope is the one who rules the world? The Pope (Vicar of Christ) claims the ultimate ownership of everything on Earth. ¨To understand this, you have to see the treaty of 1213, the papal bulls of 1455 and 1492. Do not let this information cause you alarm because without it you cannot be free. You must understand that bondage and freedom originate in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations, that they are nothing more than fictional entities that have been implanted in your mind, you will understand that our slavery is the product of our belief in fictions.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


king james

King James IV (1473-1513) and the European Muurs – Jide Uwechia King James IV (1473-1513) and the European Muurs – by Jide Uwechia King James IV of Scotland came to the throne in 1488. He was an able

the constitution

The Constitution came from our ancient laws and Hebrew laws, the Iroquois Confederacy also known as the Continental Congress. The Moors was the majority in all those groups, including the Union. Co


Post: Blog2 Post
bottom of page