THIS IS INSANE How come the only way that a people could justify a History for themsleves is to bleach another out??? Philippa of Hainault????????????????????????? The type of typical appearance that one will find of her in these heavily edited books as well as internet.. Now let us go into how she was described as looking.. This is also the MOTHER of Edward the so-called Black Prince.. When she was nine the King of England, Edward II, decided that he would marry his son, the future Edward III, to her, and sent one of his bishops, a Bishop Stapeldon, to look at her. He described her thus: “The lady whom we saw has not uncomely hair, betwixt blue-black and brown. Her head is cleaned shaped; her forehead high and broad, and standing somewhat forward. Her face narrows between the eyes, and the lower part of her face is still more narrow and slender than the forehead. Her eyes are blackish brown and deep. Her nose is fairly smooth and even, save that is somewhat broad at the tip and flattened, yet it is no snub nose. Her nostrils are also broad, her mouth fairly wide. Her lips somewhat full and especially the lower lip…all her limbs are well set and unmaimed, and nought is amiss so far as a man may see. Moreover, SHE IS BROWN SKIN ALLL OVER, and much like her father [ William I, Count of Hainaut], and in all things she is pleasant enough, as it seems to us.” DID HE SAY PALE OR AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO READ BROWN SKIN?? She is also listed as one of the 100 Great so-called Black Britons after they went and did their research. NO, she was NOT the first so-called Black queen in Europe because that is still recontructive History.. — con Damon Horbrook, Ve Michael, Multaka Mahbob y داود الشريفي.
top of page
bottom of page