bach

JOHN BACH—The London Bach—Master of the 2nd Veil Charles Burney, an English music historian, composer and musician described Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’s personal appearance in the 18th century as follows: “He is now fifty-nine, rather short in stature, with black hair and eyes, and BROWN complexion” SOURCES;

(Dr. Charles Burney, "An Eighteenth Century Musical Tour in Central Europe and the Netherlands"; 1773) (Letters of Distinguished Musicians: Gluck, Haydn, P. E. Bach, Weber, Mendelssohn; 1867) COMPLEXION = the natural color, texture, and appearance of a person's SKIN especially of the face.

This portrait of J.C. Bach was painted by Thomas Gainsborough in 1768... Thomas Gainsborough was an English portrait painter and a close friend of J.C. Bach... J.C. Bach was often in the company of the eminent painter Thomas Gainsborough and in 1768, Gainsborough painted this portrait of him… Johann Christian Bach was a German composer of the Classical era, the eighteenth child of Johann Sebastian Bach, and the youngest of his eleven sons... After a spell in Italy, Bach moved to London in 1762, where he became known as "the London Bach"

He is also sometimes known as "the English Bach", and during his time spent living in the British capital, he came to be known as John Bach... He is noted for playing a role in influencing the concerto styles of Haydn and Mozart... Bach is widely regarded as having a strong influence on the young Mozart... Scholars such as Téodor de Wyzewa and Georges de Saint-Foix described him as "The only, true teacher of Mozart" Upon hearing of Bach's death in 1782, Mozart commented, "What a loss to the musical world!" Eurocentricks and Negroes who don’t actually research portraiture tell us that the sitter in this portrait is a Colombian slave turned British composer named “Ignatius Sancho” Wether that is because of stupidity or laziness I do not know... The so called “Letters of the Late Ignatius Sancho” are Pseudepigrapha and narrative license… Pseudepigrapha are falsely attributed works, texts whose claimed author is not the true author, or a work whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past… There are absolutely no primary or firsthand historical records that can confirm the ridiculous and unrealistic biography of “Ignatius Sancho” told on Wikipedia… There are no primary or firsthand historical records that make reference to any “Ignatius Sancho” meeting Thomas Gainsborough and getting his portrait painted... Nor are there any primary or firsthand accounts asserting that Thomas Gainsborough was commissioned to paint a portrait of a Colombian slave turned British composer named “Ignatius Sancho” Here we are dealing with so called Blacks in art, and what Eurocentricks have done with so called Blacks in art... What they do is to declare those so called Blacks pictured in European art as either slaves, servants, the mythical Saint Maurice, Saint Balthazar, Olaudah Equiano, Ira Aldridge, Ignatius Sancho, or most ridiculously, Ambassadors of the King of the Congo... Another tactic they use to falsify the true meaning of so called Black artwork is to give it false and often derogatory titles... Stupid lies intended to explain away the presence of so called Blacks in Europe, i.e. they are ALWAYS Africans, slaves or servants... When portraits of so called Black nobility are discovered, Eurocentricks concoct outrageously stupid scenarios to explain their existence... They like to engage in one of their favorite methods of falsifying history, that is to declare all European so called Blacks as Africans, African Slaves, or the children of African Slaves; without the inconvenience of having to prove what they say...